Templates for the group work your course actually runs.
Start from a template that fits the kind of team project you run, then adjust it for your course.
Eight template families
Engineering capstone
Multidisciplinary build projects.
Project interest · Technical strengths · Meeting availability
Design studio
Critique, research, and prototyping courses.
Craft strengths · Term goals · Collaboration style
Business consulting projects
Strategy, marketing, and client-facing case work.
Analysis · Presentation · Client communication
Software engineering group work
CS, data, and product builds.
Stack coverage · Delivery rhythm · Weekly commitment
Health & science lab groups
Lab-based experiments and group reports.
Lab technique · Data analysis · Session availability
MBA & project management teams
Postgraduate and professional cohorts.
Industry background · Leadership style · Meeting windows
First-year transition courses
Building belonging in the first semester.
Confidence · Shared interests · Timetable fit
Peer assessment-heavy courses
Group work where peer review carries real weight.
Feedback comfort · Accountability · Commitment
Draft a survey with AI when the template is not enough
Some courses do not fit a neat box. Describe yours in plain language and Teamer drafts a formation survey you can edit and publish.
Availability
Weekly time blocks
Skills and strengths
What you bring
Preferred teammates
Who you would pick
Project interests
What you want to build
Responses
42/50
Reminders
Sent
- 1
Describe the course
“Final-year software capstone, teams of 5, mixed skill levels, client projects.”
- 2
Review the draft
Teamer suggests questions for availability, skills, preferences, and constraints.
- 3
Edit before publishing
Staff decide which questions stay, reword anything unclear, and set what students see.
AI drafts the survey. Staff decide what students answer and review teams before anything is published.
Read more about formation surveysWhat templates include
More than a survey. Each one can carry a formation survey, a team working agreement, continuation surveys, health checks, and contribution checks, so it covers the whole project, not just the first week.
Templates help staff ask better questions. Teamer keeps the matching process reviewable, and staff decide before teams are published.
Teamer uses student responses to suggest draft teams that staff can review, adjust, and publish.
Find the template that fits your course
Start from a proven pattern, or tell us about your course and we will help you set it up.
Keep exploring
The handful of questions that improve matching, and the ones that just add noise.
Why ad-hoc grouping quietly fails some students, and the principles behind teams that work.
How a coordinator builds the survey, generates teams, and keeps oversight in one place.