Teamer
Log in

Team formation & course operations for universities

Teamer helps course coordinators collect student preferences, generate reviewable teams, publish them, and run team health checks during the project.

Start a pilotSee how it works

Built for university group projects. Hosted in Australia.

See Teamer in action

From survey to stronger teams, course workflows that actually run

On one side, the survey that feeds matching. On the other, the teams, responses, and student issues staff keep across in one place.

Generate formation-ready input for every course workflow.

TEST001 / SURVEY

Team Formation Survey

Publish
Home
Cycles
People
Insights
Complaints
Hari B

How Teamer handles group work, end to end

Teamer runs the whole cycle in one workspace: collect student preferences, generate reviewable teams, publish them, and track team health. No forms, spreadsheets, and email threads to stitch back together.

SURVEY

Collect student preferences

Team Formation Surveylive
01

Responses

42/50

Inputs

8 fields

FORMATION

Generate reviewable teams

Why group projects go wrong

None of this is new to anyone who has run a course with group work. It is just hard to see in time.

Some students do not respond

Preferences arrive late or not at all, and formation stalls waiting on a handful of students.

Some teams look fine until week 4

A team that seemed balanced on paper quietly comes apart halfway through the project.

Some students carry too much work

How Teamer solves these

Reviewable draft teams

Generate draft teams you can inspect and adjust before students ever see them.

  • Swap members and rebalance in a click
  • Lock the teams you are happy with
  • Publish only when you are ready

Teams

21

Members

84

Balance

91%

Team 4T15A
PNMCJOSK
ready
Team 7W11A
RNSKMUDT
ready
Team health checks

After teams are published, Teamer keeps watching the parts spreadsheets miss.

Short check-ins ask students how the team is really going. Teamer turns the answers into a simple read on every team, so you know where to spend your time, and which teams to follow up on before the deadline.

Healthy8 teams · Working well. No action needed.
Watch3 teams · Early signs worth keeping an eye on.
At risk

Preferences captured

Survey builder

01matching signal

Interested problem space

02matching signal

Preferred classmates

View

I found my team

People

6 students, 1 staff

Hari Test 1T01active
Hari Test 2T02active
Hari Test 3T03active
View

Team state

Default Deliverable

12

teams

84%

ready

0

issues

1. Setupready
2. Surveyready
3. Teamsready
View

Built around people who actually run the course

Coordinators

Run the whole cycle for every tutorial in the course: survey, formation, publishing, and health checks.

Tutors

See the teams in your tutorials that need attention, without wading through the whole cohort.

Where your data lives, and who stays in control

Group work touches preferences, availability, and student concerns. Teamer is deliberate about where that data sits and who decides what happens with it.

Hosted in AWS Sydney

Your course runs on infrastructure in Australia.

Australian student data

Student preferences and responses stay onshore.

AI on de-identified text only

When AI matching is enabled, it works on de-identified text, never student names.

Pilot with a real course

Run a course on Teamer next term.

Tell me about your group project and I'll show you exactly where Teamer fits, from formation to team health checks.

Start a pilotLog in
Teamer™

Team formation and course operations for universities, built and run in Australia.

Product

  • Overview
  • Templates
  • How it works
  • Why projects go wrong
  • How Teamer helps
  • Team health
  • Watch the demo

Features

  • All features
  • Team formation surveys
  • AI team matching
  • Reviewable team drafts
  • Version history

Who it's for

Course workspace
SavePublish
1. Setup
2. Survey
3. Teams
4. Publish
5. Health
Default Deliverable
12 teams

Published to 48 students

Team health
1 to follow up

8

healthy

3

watch

1

at risk

Team health review

Follow up
Team A
01matching signal

What broad problem space are you interested in?

02matching signal

Who would you like on your team?

03matching signal

What are your availabilities this term?

Question 1 of 4

Next

Mix and match teams, people, complaints, and insights.

TEST001 / INSIGHTS

Team health

Live
Home
Cycles
People
Insights
Complaints
Hari B

6

students

3

cycles

84%

response

1

team

Tutorials at a glanceLast 14 days
T01
84%
T02
68%
T03
52%

Teams

12

Members

48

Balance

91%

Team AT01
HTPMAKJL
ready
Team BT02
RNSKMUDT
ready

PUBLISH

Publish teams to students

Publish teamsready
Confirmation links48/48
Tutors notified6/6
12 teams published to students

TEAM HEALTH

Run team health checks

Healthy

8

Watch

3

At risk

1

Team AHealthy
Team BWatch
Team CAt risk
Formation workspace
TEST001

Active cycle

Default Deliverable

84% responses12 teams ready1 to follow up

SURVEY

Collect student preferences

Team Formation Surveylive
01

Responses

42/50

Inputs

8 fields

FORMATION

Generate reviewable teams

01 / SURVEY

Collect student preferences

Send one formation survey. Gather availability, skills, classmate preferences, and project interests before the cohort is split into teams.

02 / FORMATION

Generate reviewable teams

Turn responses into draft teams you can inspect, adjust, and explain, not a black box you have to take on trust.

03 / PUBLISH

Publish teams to students

Release final teams over secure links. Every student sees their team and who to contact, with staff keeping final control.

04 / TEAM HEALTH

Run team health checks

During the project, short check-ins surface which teams are healthy and which need a follow-up, while there is still time to act.

One or two members do most of the work while others coast, and it only surfaces at grading.

Staff usually find out too late

By the time a problem reaches the coordinator, the deadline is close and the options are thin.

1 team · Needs a follow-up before the deadline.

TEST001 / Mid-project

Team health review

Week 5

8

Healthy

3

Watch

1

At risk

Team AT01

Even contribution

Healthy
Team DT01

On track

Healthy
Team BT02

One quiet member

Watch
Team CT03

Workload uneven

At riskFollow up

Students

Answer a short survey, see your team, and ask for help if something is not working.

Staff keep final control

Teamer suggests. Coordinators review, edit, and decide before anything is published.

Read the full trust & security page
For coordinators
  • For tutors
  • For students
  • Company

    • Guides
    • Get in touch
    • Log in

    Legal

    • Trust & security
    • AI & data handling
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    © 2026 Teamer™. All rights reserved.

    Teamer
    T01
    Healthy
    Team BT02Watch
    Team CT03At risk
    Activity
    ●Teams published
    ●Health check sent
    ●Team C flagged: at risk

    Teams

    12

    Members

    48

    Balance

    91%

    Team AT01
    HTPMAKJL
    ready
    Team BT02
    RNSKMUDT
    ready

    PUBLISH

    Publish teams to students

    Publish teamsready
    Confirmation links48/48
    Tutors notified6/6
    12 teams published to students

    TEAM HEALTH

    Run team health checks

    Healthy

    8

    Watch

    3

    At risk

    1

    Team AHealthy
    Team BWatch
    Team CAt risk